Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptive statistics

From: Socioeconomic and attitudinal differences between service users of private and public early childhood education and care in the Finnish context

Variables

%

M (SD)

The form of child’s ECEC

 Public ECEC centre

79.4

–

 Private ECEC centre + voucher

10.7

–

 Private ECEC centre + private day care allowance

9.9

–

Parental education level

 Primary or secondary education

24.3

–

 Higher education

75.7

–

Household income level

 Low

19.6

–

 Middle

61.1

–

 High

19.3

–

Parents’ attitudes related to public and private ECEC provision and the chargeability of ECEC

 1.1. My municipality offers a sufficient choice of day care services (e.g. provision at municipal and private day care centres and family day care)

–

3.75 (1.18)

 1.2. Municipal ECEC is of higher quality than private provision

–

3.05 (0.95)

 1.3. Private ECEC services should be more readily available

–

2.82 (0.93)

 1.4. Private ECEC offers a more diverse range of activities than municipal

–

2.68 (0.92)

 1.5. Municipalities should invest more in municipal ECEC provision than in subsidising private service

–

3.68 (0.96)

 1.6. Municipal ECEC providers are better in meeting children’s special needs than private providers

–

3.16 (0.86)

 1.7. ECEC should be free of charge for all children

–

3.16 (1.35)

 1.8. ECEC should be free for 5-year-old children

–

3.63 (1.19)

Parents’ attitudes related to the quality of ECEC

 2.1. Children do not receive sufficient individual attention in ECEC

–

2.57 (0.96)

 2.2. The child’s need for support is adequately considered in ECEC

–

3.73 (0.71)

 2.3. Day care group sizes are too large

–

3.94 (0.92)

 2.4. ECEC provides the stimulation that children need

–

4.12 (0.63)

 2.5. ECEC is unable to secure lasting relationships

–

2.72 (0.97)

 2.6. Children learn necessary social skills in ECEC

–

4.43 (0.59)

 2.7. High-quality ECEC requires highly trained personnel

–

3.82 (1.04)

 2.8. Adults cannot spend enough time with children and/or listen to them in ECEC

–

3.23 (0.97)

 Parent’s country of birth (0 = Finland, 1 = other)

88.6, 11.4

–

 The amount of ECEC received (0 = 0–27 h/week, 1 = over 27 h/week)

18.7, 81.3

–

 Flexibly scheduled ECEC (0 = no, 1 = yes)

96.3, 3.7

–

  1. Percentages (%) are presented for categorical variables and means (M), and standard deviations (SD) are presented for continuous variables. N  = 1375–1416