From: Is it possible to promote executive functions in preschoolers? A case study in Brazil
Variable | EG M (SE) | CG M (SE) | F (df) | p | Eta Square | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trail Making Test for Preschoolers –Total part A | Group effect | 7.24 (.5) | 6.11 (.5) | 2.711 (1, 66) | .100 | .039 |
Covariant effect | -- | -- | 4.952 (1, 66) | .029 | .070 | |
Trail Making Test for Preschoolers –Total part B | Group effect | 7.93 (.7) | 7.54 (.7) | .158 (1, 66) | .692 | .002 |
Covariant effect | -- | -- | 6.066 (1, 66) | .016 | .084 | |
Cancellation Attention Test – Total score | Group effect | 48.48 (2.2) | 41.65 (2.1) | 4.930 (1, 66) | .030 | .070 |
Covariant effect | -- | -- | 8.941 (1, 66) | .004 | .119 | |
Semantic Stroop Test - Score in part 1 | Group effect | 15.82 (.1) | 15.79 (.1) | .042 (1, 63) | .838 | <.001 |
Covariant effect | -- | -- | .162 (1, 63) | .689 | .003 | |
Semantic Stroop Test - Score in part 2 | Group effect | 15.73 (.3) | 14.75 (.3) | 5.081 (1, 63) | .028 | .075 |
Covariant effect | -- | -- | 11.969 (1, 63) | .001 | 1.6 | |
Semantic Stroop Test – Reaction time in part 1* | Group effect | .51 (.03) | .47 (.03) | 1.172 (1, 63) | .283 | .018 |
Covariant effect | -- | -- | 3.234 (1, 63) | .077 | .049 | |
Semantic Stroop Test – Reaction time in part 2* | Group effect | 1.06 (.04) | .96 (.04) | 2.964 (1, 60) | .090 | .047 |
Covariant effect | -- | -- | 30.265 (1, 60) | <.001 | .335 | |
Semantic Stroop Test – Interference score | Group effect | -.04 (.3) | −1.08 (.3) | 5.724 (1, 63) | .020 | .083 |
Covariant effect | -- | -- | 8.142 (1, 63) | .006 | .114 | |
Semantic Stroop Test – Interference – reaction time | Group effect | .52 (.04) | .51 (.04) | .026 (1, 60) | .872 | <.001 |
Covariant effect | -- | -- | 2.297 (1, 60) | .135 | .037 | |
Go NoGo Task – Total score | Group effect | .81 (.02) | .85 (.02) | 2.270 (1, 64) | .137 | .034 |
Covariant effect | -- | -- | 6.317 (1, 64) | .014 | .090 | |
Go NoGo Task – Reaction time* | Group effect | .70 (.2) | .63 (.2) | 4.669 (1, 64) | .034 | .068 |
Covariant effect | -- | -- | 22.682 (1, 64) | <.001 | .262 | |
Simon Task - Score on part 1 – congruent items | Group effect | .88 (.02) | .92 (.02) | 2.426 (1, 60) | .125 | .039 |
Covariant effect | -- | -- | 2.265 (1, 60) | .138 | .036 | |
Simon Task - Score on part 1 – incongruent items | Group effect | .99 (.02) | .93 (.02) | 5.402 (1, 60) | .024 | .083 |
Covariant effect | -- | -- | .065 (1, 60) | .800 | .001 | |
Simon Task - Score on part 2 – congruent items | Group effect | .87 (.04) | .85 (.04) | .248 (1, 60) | .620 | .004 |
Covariant effect | -- | -- | 5.229 (1, 60) | .026 | .080 | |
Simon Task - Score on part 2 – incongruent items | Group effect | .79 (.04) | .75 (.04) | .448 (1, 60) | .506 | .007 |
Covariant effect | -- | -- | 12.248 (1, 60) | .001 | .170 | |
Simon Task - Score on part 3 – congruent items | Group effect | .83 (.03) | .91 (.03) | 2.612 (1, 60) | .111 | .042 |
Covariant effect | -- | -- | .443 (1, 60) | .508 | .007 | |
Simon Task - Score on part 3 – incongruent items | Group effect | .89 (.03) | .90 (.03) | .070 (1, 60) | .792 | .001 |
Covariant effect | -- | -- | .218 (1, 60) | .642 | .004 |