Skip to main content

Table 4 Logistic Regression Predicting Claimants of the Child Care Expense Deduction among Families with a Child less than 6 - Stepwise

From: Correction to: Uptake of the child care expense deduction: exploring factors associated with the use of the child care expense deduction among families with a child under 12 years

 

Model 1

Model 2

 

Odds Ratio

Odds Ratio

Intercept

0.59

0.93

Highest education in household

  

 Bachelor’s degree or higher (REF)

1.00

1.00

 Less than a Bachelor’s degree

0.73*

0.72*

Adjusted family income quartiles

  

 Lowest income quartile 1

0.43*

0.76

 Income quartile 2

0.72

0.90

 Income quartile 3

1.09

1.30

 Highest income quartile 4 (REF)

1.00

1.00

Family Indigenous status1

  

 Lone or at least one parent Indigenous

1.24

0.89

 Lone or neither parent Indigenous (REF)

1.00

1.00

Area of residence

  

 Rural

0.89

0.95

 Urban (REF)

1.00

1.00

Region

  

 Atlantic

0.68*

0.78

 Quebec

1.00

1.00

 Ontario

0.51*

0.60*

 Prairie

0.51*

0.62*

 British Columbia

0.52*

0.64

Family work hours

  

 Lone or both parents working 30+ hrs (REF)

 

1.00

 Lone or one parent working <30 hrs,

one parent working <30 or 30+ hrs

 

0.63*

 At least one parent not working

 

0.17*

  1. Source: General Social Survey 2011 linked to T1FF
  2. *p<0.05
  3. 1Sample of Indigenous Identity distinctions (First Nations, Métis, Inuit) too small to
  4. include in analysis
  5. Note: Family work variables (family working/in school and family work schedule) were not
  6. included in the final models due to high correlation with family work hours variable
  7. Model 1: Demographic variables
  8. Model 2: Demographic variables + family work characteristics