Author/s and year | Study site, population | ECEC provision | Sample and participants | Study design, theory, details on instruments | Notes on some key findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Akar (2019) | Syrian refugee children in Jordan and Lebanon | Regional Holistic Education Programme (RHEP), designed and launched by Caritas Austria in 2015 in Lebanon and Jordan | 4 formal (pre)schools in Jordan, 7 formal (pre)schools in Lebanon and 7 non-formal centres in Lebanon; education staff, principals/directors, school counsellors and psychologists, parents, children | Qualitative study (document analysis, analysis of interviews and observations) | ECEC quality: Focus on literacy and numeracy, and socio-emotional learning (positive behaviour, empathy, and staying clam); creative and physical activities seen as recreational. Lack of opportunities for exploration, active learning Educator refugee background supports parent partnerships and relationships with children |
Akar et al. (2017) | Syrian refugee children in Jordan and Lebanon | ECEC programmes provided by NGOs for Syrian refugee children and vulnerable children from host communities | 3 (pre)schools and 3 NGO centres, representatives from 8 NGOs and the Jordan government, 2 academics in the field of ECD; programme directors, principals, teachers, social workers, when possible, children | Qualitative study (document analysis, analysis of observations and interviews) | ECEC benefits for literacy and numeracy skills, attitude towards school, social skills and communication, overcoming emotional and behavioural problems ECEC quality: Stronger focus on preparation for school and instructional learning in formal provision, instability of ECEC offer in non-formal settings. Need for educator training on refugee contexts |
Dalrymple (2019) | Burundian refugee children in refugee camps in Tanzania | Plan International Tanzania’s Child Friendly Schools (CFS) programme; delivered by educators trained by iACT in Little Ripples teacher training | 70 children aged 5 participating in the programme, 36 teachers who had received training, 38 parents of children participating in programme | Quantitative and qualitative data and analysis (surveys, child and adult focus group discussions) | ECEC benefits for learning outcomes and behaviour, and in parent value for early learning ECEC quality: Lack of resources, success of training and mindfulness to improve learning and behaviour |
Erdemir. E. (2021a) | Vulnerable communities including Syrian refugee and local children, in Turkey, south-eastern Anatolia region | Summer Preschool Programme to promote developmental wellbeing and school readiness of children from refugee and poverty-backgrounds | 711 children aged 5–6 participating in the summer preschool intervention programme | Pre-test/post-test quasi-experimental design with intervention and comparison group, each including refugee and local children (child assessments) | ECEC benefits for early academic skills, Turkish language skills, and social–emotional outcomes. Intervention group: fewer problems in emotion regulation and behaviour problems than comparison group. Local children more progress in pre-literacy and -numeracy, refugee children more progress on language skills than comparison groups |
Erdemir, E. (2021b) | Syrian refugee children in a resettlement community in Istanbul/Turkey | see above | 36 children aged 5–6 who competed the summer preschool programme | Qualitative study (child interviews) Community Cultural Wealth framework | ECEC benefits for children’s cultural wealth capital, seen in behaviour inside and outside ECEC, impacting positively on relationships and learning |
Erdemir, E. (2021c) | Syrian refugee children and their mothers in a resettlement community in Istanbul/Turkey | see above | 32 mothers whose 5–6-year-old children completed the programme | Qualitative grounded theory study (parent interviews) Transactional theory of Child Development | ECEC benefits for cognitive, language, socio-emotional, and self-care development. New skills taken to home environment, changes in parent concept of child and parental practices |
iAct (2015) | Refugee children from Darfur, Sudan in refugee camps in Eastern Chad | Little Ripples (LR) iACT’s comprehensive ECEC programme for 3–5-year-olds. In this study implemented in home-based settings (Little Ripples Ponds) | 134 children aged 3–5 and their caregivers registered in the programme | Longitudinal study, assessing change from baseline assessment to follow-up one year later within one group of children with ECEC attendance (child assessments, parent reports) | ECEC benefits in areas of children’s cognitive and socio-emotional development, health and hygiene routines |
Jesuit Refugee Service & iACT () | See above | see above | 117 children aged 3–5 attending six Little Ripples Ponds and their caregivers | see above | ECEC benefits in areas of children’s cognitive and socio-emotional development, health and hygiene routines; ECEC as a safe place |
Mbidde & Oguniyoi (2019) | Refugees and host communities in settlements and communities in Northern Uganda | Support for ECD centres through a project implemented by Right to Play, with the aim of improving access and quality of ECEC for refugee and host community children | 337 children at preschool age attending 6 ECD centres targeted by the project (60 children per centre randomly selected), 30 educators (5 per centre), 3 district education officials | Quantitative cross-sectional evaluation, plus qualitative data (child assessments, observations, and adult interviews) | ECEC quality: ECEC as a safe place, with educators focusing on creating a safe and supportive learning environment; some understanding of play-based learning but educators not fully supported in their implementation by training or curriculum plans |
Refugee children from South Sudan (Dinka ethnic group) in refugee camps in Uganda | Plan international's Community-Led Action for Children (CLAC) model for early learning or preschool education | 126 children aged 3–6 participating in the ECEC programme, and 74 children in the comparison group; 30 educators, 30 parents, 3 key informants, 2 NGO staff members, 2 community leaders | Quantitative cross-sectional quasi-experimental design (parent reports), plus qualitative data (to answer other research questions, not included here) Vygotsky’s social-cultural theory and the human capital approach | ECEC benefits in communication, gross motor and fine motor skills, cognitive skills and personal-social skills (all in favour of the intervention group) | |
Smith (2015) | Refugees (mainly) from Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo in a refugee settlement in Western Uganda | Comprehensive preschools linked to Child Friendly Centres (CFC) and supported by UNICEF and the Ministry of Education | Cross-section of 22 private and community based ECEC centres, 3 government officers, parents and members of the ECD Centre Management Committees, government officials, focal persons, and partners (n = 145) | Qualitative case study (observations, interviews, and focus group discussions) | ECEC benefits in early cognitive development, literacy and numeracy skills, language and communication, and social skills. Recovery from trauma through art and play Educator knowledge that is transferred back to the households and community, and changes in child behaviour, leads to changes in parenting practices and increase in value of early learning. Programme led to communities coming together, strengthening of group bonds |
Tanaka (2013) | Karen refugee children from Myanmar in refugee camps on the border to Myanmar, Tak province of Thailand | Community-led preschools, with the support of an international NGO. Providing a safe and sanitary space, meals, and a child-centred curriculum | 331 children aged 2–5 randomly selected from 35 classrooms (n = 331) | Cross sectional, quasi-experimental design, comparing differences in child outcomes between children with more than 1 year attendance, versus those with less attendance (educator reports/checklists) | ECEC benefits: Higher scores on the psychosocial development scale (total score) (in favour of the group that had attended ECEC for longer) |
Tobin, et al. (2015) | Migrants and refugee children with Karen, Burmese, and Shan language backgrounds in a refugee community at the Thai–Myanmar border | Montessori classroom focusing on child-directed learning and the use of specifically designed Montessori materials, versus ECEC classrooms following the Thai ECEC curriculum | 66 children aged 3–6 attending two types of ECEC (convenience sampling) | Longitudinal study to test for differences from baseline to follow-up (educator reports) | ECEC benefits: At follow-up, children at the Montessori school lessened or closed the gap across five domains, but differences in improvement from baseline to follow-up were significant only for personal-social development |
UNICEF (2018) | Refugee children from South Sudan in a refugee settlement in northern Uganda | Early childhood programmes in ECEC centres and child friendly spaces, participating in training on the use of EDC Kits. Foundational or enhanced (engaging parents in toymaking) ECD Kit training | 7975 children aged 3–6 attending 20 ECEC classrooms across 6 ECEC providers, representative sub-samples of educators (n = 104), parents (n = 252) and management committee members (n = 42) | Formative and longitudinal evaluation (including field observations, focus groups, interviews and a survey), with data collection at 3 time points | ECEC benefits in children’s language/literacy and numeracy skills, socio-emotional development, and hygiene practices. During later interviews, prents focused to a lesser extent on recovery from trauma or stress Recognition of how play supports children’s learning |
VSO Bangladesh (2019) & Laxton, et al. (2020) | Rohingya refugee children in a refugee camp in Cox Bazar, Bangladesh | ECEC programme (MESH; Mapping Educational Specialist Knowhow), developed by the VSO Bangladesh team with the support of national and international volunteers to improve the quality of provision | Subsamples of providers and parents of children aged 3–5 participating in the programme (350 parents for a survey, 10 parents and 6 children for a focus group, 10 providers for observations, 13 educators and 6 community leaders, implementers, and staff members for interviews) | Explorative case study, qualitative and quantitative data (interviews, focus groups, observations, document analysis, survey) | ECEC benefits for early academic skills, language, socio-emotional-, physical- and motor development, and improvement in behaviour ECEC quality: Children engaged in activities. Educators highly engaged in verbal interactions, preparing materials to support their teaching and making use of strategies to introduce topics. Parents satisfied with the teaching strategies, content, and materials, and the relationship skills of educators Educator training supports pedagogy and lesson preparation |